|
Family Press
Releases
|
Judicial Review |
European Court of Human Rights
Cory Report
|
Stevens Inquiry
|
Miscellaneous
|
Further Reading
Legal
figures add weight to Finucane inquiry call
19th February 2009 --
THE British Government has signalled it may avoid
holding even a controlled inquiry into the murder of Pat Finucane, an
international conference in honour of the Belfast solicitor at Dublin’s Trinity
College was told on Saturday.
The conference paid tribute to the life, work and legacy of Pat Finucane on the
20th anniversary of his murder. Delegates heard from an impressive international
panel of leading human rights activists and legal figures including Pat’s wife,
Geraldine Finucane; Canadian former Supreme Court judge Peter Cory; leading
British human rights laywer Michael Mansfield QC; and the former UN Special
Rapporteur on the Independence of Judges and Lawyers, Param Cumaraswamy.
Addressing the conference, Belfast solicitor Peter Madden, who shared a legal
practice with Pat, read from a letter the Finucane family had received from the
British Government on the anniversary of Pat’s death.
British Secretary of State to the North Shaun Woodward’s Principal
Under-Secretary, Simon Marsh, wrote that the Government was considering the
report of the Eames/Bradley Consultative Group on the Past and that “no decision
has yet been taken by Government in relation to any of the group’s
recommendations, including their recommendations in relation to any Finucane
inquiry”.
The letter went on to say:
“All these matters, like the outcome of discussions with the Finucane family, or
their legal representatives about the form of any inquiry, will, of course, be
relevant factors for ministers in deciding whether it remains in the public
interest to proceed with an inquiry.” Speaking after the conference, Pat’s son,
John Finucane, said that the British Government “appears to be preparing to
break promises that they made, not only to ourselves but also to the Irish
Government and others”. He added: “The question needs to be asked: just in whose
interest would it be not to have a public inquiry into my father’s murder?”
Geraldine Finucane said the family firmly rejects the idea that the past could
be swept under the carpet.
“Recent efforts to find mechanisms to address the past underline how important
it is that we build our future on solid foundations. The society that forgets
its past, or worse, tries to pretend it never existed, is doomed to repeat it.”
Jane Winter from British Irish Rights Watch also voiced her concerns.
“In my opinion, the Eames/Bradley report puts too little emphasis on
transparency, too little focus on the truth and too much emphasis on putting the
past in the past.”
Madden said that while there while the aspirations towards reconciliation in the
Eames/Bradley report are positive, “the way to achieve reconciliation is not
through burying the truth”.
Michael Mansfield said he is appalled at the suggestion that holding an open
inquiry into Pat’s death would not be in the public interest. “The only ones who
should decide what’s in the public interest are the public,” he said.
“The British Government sending this letter on Pat’s anniversary is no
coincidence. Well, we will send the British Government a clear message back from
this conference: we will not settle for anything less than the full truth
because Pat was just the tip of an iceberg of a British policy of systemic
collusion – and some of the operative that would be revealed are still
operative.
“It’s not just because Pat’s family deserves to know the extent of collusion –
as do so many other families – but because there will be no genuine, lasting
peace in Ireland until there is justice. And justice must be built upon the full
disclosure of the truth.”
Mansfield outlined the drive by the British Government to keep inquests out of
the public eye.
The Inquiries Act 2005, which allows the home secretary to issue ‘restriction
orders’ on an inquest enabling the withholding of evidence from the coroner, is
the “only possible” means for investigating the Finucane case, the British
Government insists. It is a transparent attempt to conceal the role of
Government security agencies and the political establishment’s role in
“controversial” killings.
“Now the new Coroners’ Bill, going before the parliament this year would, if
passed, allow for the Secretary of State to decide that inquests should be held
in secret if it is in ‘the national interest’,” the QC explained.
“The bill is attempting to resurrect the legislation that was defeated last year
in the House of Lords contained in the ‘anti-terror’ 42-day detention proposals.
The result would be that, in certain cases, there may possibly be no inquest, or
if there is one it will be controlled. There would be no jury, the coroner will
be appointed by the Government, the whole thing could be held in camera, with no
publication of the findings.”
As she was opening the conference, Geraldine Finucane said:
“Pat may have been taken from us far too soon but what he achieved in his short
life, professionally and personally, cannot be measured through a mere sum of
years.”
Belfast High Court judge Séamus Treacy spoke about the advances in human rights
law that Pat’s work, together with Peter Madden, achieved in 10 years of
practice.
“In bringing about change in a rotten system, Pat advanced fair trial rights and
the right of prisoners to legal recourse against prison governors and the right
of access to solicitors.”
Judge Peter Cory paid tribute to the Finucane family:
“Geraldine has become an international symbol of courage and dedication to the
cause of her husband.”
Former UN Special Rapporteur on the Independence of Judges and Lawyers Param
Cumaraswamy said:
“Along with everyone else in this room, I deeply admire the courage and
determination of the Finucane family.
“I was given an assurance by Tony Blair in April 2001 that there would be an
independent inquiry into Pat’s murder – which, eight years on, has not
eventuated,” he said.
“Perhaps it is time to refer the case back to the European Court of Human Rights
in order to bring pressure to bear on the British Government.”
Param Cumaraswamy also discussed the failure of the British Government, RUC and
Law Society in the North to provide protection for Rosemary Nelson, who was
murdered in a loyalist car-bomb in March 1999.
Top↑
|