
Madden & Finucane
Ranked
Number 1
by Chambers,
the clients guide
to the legal profession
Chambers and Partners have been publishing their
world-famous guides to the legal profession since 1990. The key to the success
of their legal directories and the validity of their awards is the in-depth,
unbiased research conducted by their team of highly qualified and experienced
researchers. View more

Madden & Finucane
present
the Madden & Finucane
and Pat Finucane
Aisling Awards
The Aisling Bursaries, launched in March 2000, are
an educational initiative between Belfast Media Group and West Belfast
Partnership. The Aisling Bursaries are designed to help students defray their
education and training costs.
View
more
|
|
No forensics against Colombia Three
31 January, 2002 --
A respected British forensics expert has concluded that there is no forensic
evidence that any of the three Irishmen currently being held in Colombia had any
contact with explosives
Peter Madden, of Madden and Finucane Solicitors commissioned one of the world's
leading forensic explosives experts, Keith Borer to examine the documentation
concerning the forensic tests taken from Niall Connolly, Martin McCauley and Jim
Monaghan. He concluded that "on the current evidence, it is my opinion that it
is unlikely the three defendants were contaminated with explosives as directed."
In all there were three forensic tests taken in the case of the three Irishmen.
The first was taken by a US Embassy official in a military barracks, alleging
that it tested positive for drugs and explosives. This was ruled illegal by the
prosecutor because at that stage the Prosecution office had not even been
informed of the arrests. This was a violation of the Colombian Constitution.
The second test was taken by the US Embassy and they allege that it was positive
for explosives. The third test was taken by the Colombian Security Services and
all their tests proved negative.
The investigative stage of the case against the men has been closed early by the
Prosecutor, without hearing the witnesses for the defence or this latest
forensic evidence. The Defence and Prosecution have until tomorrow to present
their summing up of this stage. The Prosecutor will then decide on whether to
bring charges against the men or free them.
CaitrĂona Ruane, spokesperson for the campaign said: "One of the world's leading
forensic scientists has examined all the material in relation to the forensic
reports and found that the 'positive forensic tests' carried out by the US
Embassy do not prove positive for explosives. The tests could have had a
positive reaction to a number of different substances. According to this expert
there is no forensic evidence against the men. This report, dated 25 January
2002, has been submitted to our lawyers in Colombia and has been sent to the
prosecution.
"David Andrews and myself are just back from a week-long visit to Colombia, the
men are held in a top security wing in La Picota jail. Each of the three men are
sharing a cell with suspected drug traffickers. Their lives are in danger, the
prison situation in Colombia is very volatile. They are not getting a fair legal
process and the case has been closed early against them to stop this new
evidence being considered."
|
|
more..
|
|



|