Madden & Finucane
Ranked
Number 1
by Chambers,
the clients guide
to the legal profession
Chambers and Partners have been publishing their
world-famous guides to the legal profession since 1990. The key to the success
of their legal directories and the validity of their awards is the in-depth,
unbiased research conducted by their team of highly qualified and experienced
researchers. View more
Madden & Finucane
present
the Madden & Finucane
and Pat Finucane
Aisling Awards
The Aisling Bursaries, launched in March 2000, are
an educational initiative between Belfast Media Group and West Belfast
Partnership. The Aisling Bursaries are designed to help students defray their
education and training costs.
View
more
|
|
Acquittal exposes Diplock system
12 April, 2001 --
The acquittal of former prisoner Gerard Magee on Friday 6 April opens the way
for former prisoners convicted in non-jury Diplock courts to have their
convictions similarly overturned.
The judgment handed down last Friday by the North's top judge, Carswell, now
calls into question many of the convictions based mostly on confession evidence
obtained by the RUC through the ill treatment of detainees in holding centres
such as Castlereagh and Gough Barracks in Armagh over the years.
The judgment, although forced on the North's judiciary by the European Court of
Human Rights, nonetheless means that the conveyer belt of British justice in the
Six Counties has been exposed for its violations of the human rights of
detainees.
Gerard Magee from Antrim was arrested in December 1988 and charged with
conspiracy to kill British soldiers and possession of explosives. He was
convicted of these charges in December 1990 by Judge Murray.
The only evidence against Magee was a signed confession made in Castlereagh RUC
barracks in Belfast. Magee argued that he made the confession under duress and
says he was physically abused by his RUC interrogators. He was also denied
access to his solicitor during the first crucial 48 hours of interrogations,
during which he made the confession used to convict him.
Judge Murray rejected Magee's claims and accused him of fabricating the
allegations. Magee appealed but in June 1993 the Court of Appeal dismissed the
appeal, saying it was satisfied that the original conviction was ``neither
unsafe or unsatisfactory''.
Meanwhile, Magee instituted proceedings before the European Court of Human
Rights (ECHR), arguing that his treatment in Castlereagh was in breach of the
European Convention on Human Rights.
On 6June 2000 the ECHR, in a written decision, ruled in Magee's favour stating,
``there had been a violation of Article 6 (1) of the Convention, in conjunction
with Article 6 (3)(c) as regards the denial of access to a solicitor.
Given that Magee had already brought his case to the Criminal Cases Review
Commission, this body, in light of the European ruling, returned his case to the
Court of Appeal, which in turn acquitted him.
In his judgment, Carswell acknowledged that ``if other cases come before us
concerning admissions made in Castlereagh by persons whose access to legal
advice was deferred, we shall take the ECHR's decision into account''.
Speaking about the ruling, Magee said: ``Many people were abused by the RUC. I
hope this will lead to many opportunities for people to seek legal redress.''
Patricia Coyle of solicitors Madden and Finucane said: ``This is an important
judgement for others who have been convicted in Diplock Courts, either wholly or
substantially on alleged confession evidence extracted under the regimes of
Castlereagh and Gough Barracks without access to legal advice.''
|
|
more..
|
|
|